It's worth mentioning
that the response rate was much higher than for the first review,
and that the information provided was far more detailed. Perhaps this
indicates that the Branching Outers had recognised the value of long-term
personal evaluation?
The data showed
that everyone felt that a lot was expected of them in their role as
an agent of change, both by Branching Out and by their authority.
They felt that they were expected to significantly raise the profile
of reader development, often acting without enough time or perhaps
support from colleagues or senior management. One said:
'I'm expected
to be very proactive in spreading the 'gospel' of reader development
to my colleagues.'
They also felt
that they were expected to promote stock selection changes, reader
development projects and partnerships with external agencies.
However, it was
also clear that many participants appreciated the opportunity that
Branching Out had given them to increase their status within their
authority, even in some cases to influence senior management decision-making
processes. This had obviously given them a sense of personal and professional
achievement. Comments made included:
'I have made
a major contribution to real changeĀ
and this gives me a sense of
achievement'
'It makes
me feel involved at all levels of the department.'
Overall, respondents
felt that their colleagues and senior managers were now more supportive
of Branching Out than before, particularly as there were now many
visible, concrete outcomes in the form of reader development projects:
'Colleagues
[are] now more aware of the benefits of Branching Out and my time
spent on projects'
'I think
the concepts and ideals of Branching Out have become clearer and
colleagues are able to see some of the initiatives are now coming
through'.
Participants were
generally unsure whether library users now had a more positive attitude
towards reader development, although a number believed that changes
in this area were beginning to take place. They said, for example:
'Having spoken
to several readers' groups, set up various 'reader's choice' type
of promotions etc., it's very apparent that there is a great need
and enthusiasm for activities around reader development.'
The overall message
to emerge from the second learning review was that participants had
derived significant professional benefits and personal satisfaction
from their involvement in Branching Out, and felt that improvements
were also being made in their local authority as a result of the work
they had done.
Click
here for a full text version of Learning Review 2