Outline
of Event
Author
Bill Broady met with members of Newton Hall Library Readers' Group
to discuss Bill's new novel Swimmer. The event took place at
Newton Hall Library at 7.30 pm on Tuesday, 25 January 2000 and was
attended by Rachel Van Riel, Director of Branching Out, Guy Pringle
and Kelly Edgson-Wright from HarperCollins, and Maureen Robinson and
Val Page, both Branching Out librarians.
This
page also includes extracts from the question and answer session with
Bill Broady, the participants' feedback form and some responses, and
some reader reviews of Swimmer by borrowers from North Tyneside Central
Library.
This
was the first in what we hope to be a series of similar events born
out of the new Publisher partnership initiative involving Branching
Out and HarperCollins. These events aim to break with the traditional
format of author events by making them more of an opportunity for
dialogue between authors and readers; a chance for readers and authors
to share their thoughts on books and reading; a two-way exchange of
views and ideas.
If the
first event is anything to go by - we are onto a winner! The evening
was a great success and proved to be very fruitful for the 16 readers'
group members, HarperCollins, the author and Branching Out. Rachel
Van Riel, acting as facilitator for the evening, began with some ice-breaking
questions to be discussed in pairs:
- Where
do you read?
- When
do you read?
And then
more specifically about Swimmer:
- What
drew you into the book?
- What
made you draw back from the book?
Results
of the animated discussions which followed were fed back to the whole
group after about 10 minutes.
Suitably
relaxed, we moved on to a more focussed discussion of Bill's new book
Swimmer. Members of the reading groups had been given the chance
to read the proof copies prior to the book's publication on 5 January
2000, so all were familiar with the novel. Bill began this part of
the evening by reading the first 7 pages of Swimmer to set
the scene. Although the questions were directed to Bill, they also
drew comments from others in the group eager to share their perceptions
and Bill himself commented at the end of the evening that he felt
he understood his own book better having listened to the views of
the readers!
[top]
Questions
to the author
Q
How did you understand/get into the mindset
of a teenage girl? Did you do extensive research on just what it
takes to be a dedicated athlete at that level of competition?
A
We learned from
Bill that a close personal relationship had influenced his writing
although he wrote the book at first as if by instinct, he did set
about doing some research afterwards to make sure he could trust
his 'gut feelings.'
(This
opened out into a wide-ranging group discussion on the heroine;
her relationships; her father; her mother; teenagers in general;
sportspersons in particular; the demands placed upon any 'gifted'
child. Would it appeal to teenagers? One reader told us that her
teenage daughter had 'absolutely devoured' the book.)
Q
I found all the relationships in the book
lacking in any warmth, was that deliberate?
A
Bill agreed that
his narrative 'went into the dark places' but he hoped that it did
'shine a light.'
(More
general discussion this time centered on the father/daughter/mother
and other relationships in the book. One reader suggested that the
fascist imagery was deliberate. This caught the group's attention
and led to further discussion on the 'inevitable fascism of sport'
having to push youngsters to get up to snuff!)
Q
The girl had no personality, no name. Why?
A
The intention was
to convey a sense of universality an 'everyman' approach.
This led
almost immediately on to the next question:
Q
Who is the narrator?
Was it the girl herself? A counsellor, therapist, partner, friend?
A
The novel had begun life as a lyric poem and so the style was suited
to that medium. As it developed into a novel, Bill was happy to
leave the impersonal voice although he did almost change the very
last line which would have answered the question - he decided to
leave it open for the reader's own interpretation.
Q
Do you consider your heroine to be a success
or a failure? Was she mad? Was she always mad?
A
Bill talked of
how he believed that people who are 'damaged or hurt' in some way
can achieve 'other realms, other feelings' to compensate for their
apparent 'differences', and that they can 'go a lot further than
us ordinary folk.'
(Again,
those questions led to a range of opinions on 'how do you measure
success?' 'What constitutes failure?' 'Was she emotionally damaged
as a child, as an athlete, as a woman?')
During
the course of the evening we learned that Bill has been writing
for 25 years and has written novels before, but he had been unhappy
with the others as he felt they were often 'pastiches of other authors'
styles' and he felt that with Swimmer he had finally 'found his
own voice.' His next book to be published soon will be a collection
of short stories Tale of Golden Bath Tubs, the title story of which
he considers to be 'the best he has written.' He is currently working
on his next full-length novel which is set in the early years of
the 20th Century and takes as its theme the characters and events
of a young Labour Party. He is eager that each new work explores
very different themes and forms.
There
was some discussion about the way Swimmer had been presented. Was
it a novel or a novella? One reader said he thought the cover made
it look like a teenage read. The double line spacing and choice
of font did not find favour with some of the group, although those
who liked it felt quite strongly that it 'suited' the book. Many
readers commented on the 'speed' of the book, saying they felt as
if they were being swept along by the pace of the text, someone
commented that the rhythm of the writing made her feel 'as if she
were swimming.'
The evening
drew to a close after over two hours with Bill signing copies of
his book.
[top]
Questions
from the participants' feedback form prepared for the event
Have you attended
an author event before? If so, how was this one different?
What did
you enjoy/not enjoy about the evening?
What did
you learn?
What did
you think about the structure of the evening and the balance between:
talking in pairs about your own reading; talking in pairs about
Swimmer; talking as a whole group with Bill Broady?
Would
you have liked more/less time on any of the above?
Would
you have liked Bill to read from Swimmer: more/less/about right?
What difference
did it make to your enjoyment of the event that you had read the
author's book before you arrived?
What difference
did it make that the rest of the audience had read the author's
book?
Will you
be interested to read Bill Broady's second novel?
Would
you attend another event like this one?
[top]
Comments
on the evening with Bill Broady taken from participants' evaluation
forms
How was
this event different from author events you've attended before?
'It
was far more personal and rewarding because there was a sense of
real discussion with the author.'
'Much
more interactive and informal.'
'A
significant difference in terms of feeling included in the event.'
[top]
Reader
reviews of Swimmer from North Tyneside Central Library
'It
was a frightening insight into human emotions, very explicit and
moving. I cried at the end for what she had missed.'
'It
made me think about so many things - ambition, competition, expectations
of women. In literary terms it is very effective - use of second
person singular, for example, to provide distance, lack of volition.
But in the end it suffers from the very coldness it is evoking.
I don't think many readers would enjoy it because of its hopelessness.'
Val Page
comments: 'We
don't usually get such prompt or articulate replies to requests for
book reviews, these two turned up after only three days - must tell
us something!'